Home › Combined sewers

Combined sewers and basement flooding in metro Detroit: which communities still have combined sewer areas

In much of the region's older housing, sewage and stormwater run through the same pipe under the street. That design decision, made across older parts of the region, is one piece of hidden infrastructure behind many metro Detroit basement backups. Here is which communities verifiably have it, straight from the permits and public plans.

Basement Risk Check · July 2026 · How we score risk

If you own a pre-1960 home with a basement in Wayne, Oakland, or Macomb county, the age of your house tells you a lot about your flood exposure, but the sewer under your street can tell you a lot more. This page is for owner-occupants of those older homes, especially anyone with a finished basement, who wants to know one specific fact: is my community on a combined sewer? We went to the primary documents, the NPDES permits, county notification plans, and city engineering plans, and classified only the communities where a source actually says so. Sewer status is as of July 2026, per the sources listed on each row.

33+verified communities, every row sourced
8combined citywide or nearly
25combined in part, a district or portion
6named communities still need a settling document

These are community and district level classifications, not street level sewer maps.

One thing this page does not claim: that every street in an amber community is combined. It classifies only what public permits, county plans, or city documents support. An unshaded community is not necessarily separated.

Map of metro Detroit shading the 33 communities with documented combined sewer systems or districts: 8 red communities combined citywide or nearly, 25 amber communities combined in part, Harper Woods green as separation documented, all others gray meaning not yet classified from primary records
Verified combined sewer communities, checked July 2026. Red means citywide or nearly citywide combined. Amber means combined in part. A community not shaded is not necessarily separated, it only means we did not classify it from the primary sources reviewed. Green marks a community with documented separation, which lowers the structural odds of a backup but does not remove them. The Grosse Pointes get their own close-up map further down the page.

Jump to the community table ↓

What a combined sewer is

The U.S. EPA's definition is the plainest: "In a combined sewer system, both wastewater and stormwater flow through the same pipes," and during wet weather "the combined flow of wastewater and stormwater can overwhelm the system" (EPA, Combined Sewer Overflow Basics). Michigan's environmental agency, EGLE, describes it the same way: "snowmelt, rainwater runoff, and wastewater (sewage) from inside houses and buildings are all combined in one pipe. When the pipes become full, excess combined sewage can be released at points throughout the system" (EGLE combined sewer overflow explainer).

Newer subdivisions were built differently, with one pipe for sanitary flow and a separate one for storm runoff. As the Great Lakes Water Authority puts it, "Newer sewer systems are constructed with separate storm and sanitary sewers, so they do not have the same capacity challenges" (GLWA CSO FAQ). That is why sewer design tracks housing age so closely in this region, and why the oldest communities carry the most combined pipe.

COMBINED: ONE PIPE basement rain street drain shared storm + sanitary pipe backup path SEPARATED: TWO PIPES basement street drain storm pipe sanitary pipe
Schematic, not to scale. Backups can still happen in separated systems, but a combined system puts stormwater and sewage into the same pipe during heavy rain, and the overflow path can be the lowest connected point: the basement.

Why one pipe raises basement-backup risk

The mechanism is capacity. A combined pipe sized for sewage must also swallow every downpour. GLWA's own FAQ states it directly: "A combined sewer overflow may occur during a significant rain event because the collection system rapidly reaches capacity, which increases the risk of flooding and basement backups" (GLWA CSO FAQ). When a full combined sewer has nowhere to send water, one of the places it goes is backward, up floor drains and into the lowest connected point, which in a pre-1960 home is the basement.

Local governments say the same thing when they spend money on it. Macomb County describes its Chapaton basin upgrades as projects to "reduce combined sewer overflows and reduce the risk of basement flooding," needed "to prevent station failure that would result in sewage backing up into basements and neighborhoods" (Macomb County Public Works, 2023). None of this means a home on a combined sewer will flood, or that a home on separated sewers cannot. It means the structural odds are worse where the pipe is shared, especially in older housing. If a backup has already happened to you, see our guide to the 45-day claim deadline and who to file with. If you are weighing a backwater valve or interior drain to lower that risk, start with what a backwater valve costs in 2026 and who actually needs one, and our directory of verified local contractors shows each firm's license status and the communities it serves.

Which communities verifiably have combined sewers

Two honest classes, nothing softer. Combined (citywide or nearly) means an operator, state, or federal document says the community's local system is combined citywide or that a combined district covers all or nearly all of it. Combined in part (district or portion) means a government document places a defined portion, an acreage or a named district, on combined sewers, or the community holds or appears on a combined-sewer-overflow (CSO) discharge permit. The rest of the community may be separated. One important distinction: nearly every community's sewage eventually reaches a regional interceptor that carries combined flow. That alone does not make the local system combined, and the table below is about local collection systems and defined combined districts only. A row in either class is a community or district level fact. It does not prove that every street in that community runs on combined pipes.

Across Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties, at least 33 communities can be verifiably placed on combined sewers from permits and public plans: 8 citywide or nearly, 25 in part. For every community not listed, absence of proof is not proof of separation.

Wayne County (14 communities)

CommunityStatusWhat the source saysPrimary sourceChecked
DearbornCombined in part (district or portion)Separated most of its single-pipe system by 2021 under a federally mandated CSO program, but still holds CSO permit MI0025542, so it stays partially combined, post-separationCity of Dearborn construction updates · EPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
Dearborn HeightsCombined in part (district or portion)Wayne County operates a CSO retention basin serving a 548-acre combined area of the cityWayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026
DetroitCombined (citywide or nearly)"The combined sewer collection system has nearly 3,000 miles of sewer piping, more than 90,000 catch basins"City of Detroit DWSDJuly 2026
Grosse PointeCombined in part (district or portion)The city's own stormwater project page describes FEMA-funded work "to aid in the separation of the City's combined sanitary and stormwater system" to reduce basement backups and street flooding. FEMA awarded the first design phase in April 2025, so combined areas remain while separation is engineeredCity of Grosse Pointe stormwater separation updates · FEMA award, April 2025July 2026
Grosse Pointe FarmsCombined in part (district or portion)Originally built combined. The lakeside district was separated around 2000 per local records, while the inland district remains combined, with separation phases running 2026 to 2028 starting at 310 acresGP Farms sewer separation project · Grosse Pointe News on the inland districtJuly 2026
Grosse Pointe ParkCombined in part (district or portion)City reports describe ongoing sewer separation work and note the Patterson Park storm system is already "a separate system from the sanitary sewer". City documents imply rather than state the word "combined," so we keep the "part" labelGP Park infrastructure reportsJuly 2026
Grosse Pointe WoodsCombined (citywide or nearly)The city "owns and operates a combined sewer system that serves the entire city" (2023 city plan). Its combined sewers discharge to the Milk River treatment systemGP Woods CWSRF project plan · Milk River drain notification planJuly 2026
HamtramckCombined (citywide or nearly)FEMA case study describes relief sewers that "collect combined sewage" and cites frequent basement and street flooding. The city sits in GLWA's Conner Creek combined districtFEMA case study, HamtramckJuly 2026
Highland ParkCombined (citywide or nearly)State environmental assessment: roughly 119 miles of sewer, and "the combined sewer system directs wastewater to GLWA's Wastewater Recovery Facility"EGLE environmental assessmentJuly 2026
InksterCombined in part (district or portion)The Inkster CSO retention basin serves an 800-acre area of the city. A second, city-owned CSO basin (Middlebelt) also operatesWayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026
Redford TownshipCombined in part (district or portion)The Redford CSO retention basin serves a 521-acre area, with additional combined-sewer regulators. The township also holds its own CSO permitWayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026
River RougeCombined (citywide or nearly)The city-owned River Rouge CSO retention basin, operated by Wayne County, serves a 930-acre service area under permit MI0028819Wayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026
SouthgateCombined in part (district or portion)Of the district's 2,489 acres in Southgate, "approximately 1,046 acres served by combined sewers and 1,443 acres served by separate storm and sanitary sewers"Wayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026
WyandotteCombined (citywide or nearly)The Southgate-Wyandotte drainage district covers "2,772 acres in the City of Wyandotte, all of which is served by combined sewers"Wayne County CSO notification planJuly 2026

Oakland County (15 communities)

Fourteen of these sit, all or in part, in the George W. Kuhn (GWK) drainage district, formerly Twelve Towns: a combined-sewer district of about 24,500 acres whose storm-and-sanitary flow is treated at the GWK retention basin in Madison Heights. Oakland County's Water Resources Commissioner describes the facility as "capturing and treating combined stormwater and sanitary flow" for 14 municipalities. For several of these communities only part of the city lies in the combined district, so we label all of them "in part" rather than overclaim.

CommunityStatusWhat the source saysPrimary sourceChecked
BerkleyCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Beverly HillsCombined in part (district or portion)In the GWK list. Also home to the Acacia Park CSO basin, which "services an 816-acre watershed, treating approximately 70 million gallons of CSOs annually"Oakland County WRC · EPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
BirminghamCombined in part (district or portion)In the GWK list. The Birmingham CSO basin and tunnel "services a 1,185-acre watershed"Oakland County WRC · EPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
Bloomfield TownshipCombined in part (district or portion)The Bloomfield Village CSO basin "services a 2,325-acre watershed, treating approximately 122 million gallons of CSOs annually"Oakland County WRC · EPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
ClawsonCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
FerndaleCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Hazel ParkCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Huntington WoodsCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Madison HeightsCombined in part (district or portion)In the GWK list. The GWK retention basin itself, treating combined stormwater and sanitary flow, is located hereOakland County WRC, GWK basinJuly 2026
Oak ParkCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Pleasant RidgeCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Royal OakCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
Royal Oak TownshipCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community listOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
SouthfieldCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community list. The district covers the eastern portion of the cityOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026
TroyCombined in part (district or portion)Named in the GWK combined district's 14-community list. The district covers the southwest portion of the cityOakland County WRC · GWK district flyerJuly 2026

Macomb County (4 communities)

CommunityStatusWhat the source saysPrimary sourceChecked
EastpointeCombined (citywide or nearly)The Chapaton pump station and basin handles "combined stormwater and sanitary flow" for a drainage district "that includes all of Eastpointe"Macomb County Public Works, 2023July 2026
Mount ClemensCombined in part (district or portion)The city's wastewater plant holds CSO permit MI0023647, discharging to the Clinton RiverEPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
RosevilleCombined in part (district or portion)The Martin Drain pump station "services roughly 9,000 acres of land in Roseville and St. Clair Shores" for permitted, treated combined sewage dischargesSEMSD facilities · EPA Michigan CSO tableJuly 2026
St. Clair ShoresCombined (citywide or nearly)The Chapaton district covers "most of St. Clair Shores" and the Martin district adds more. The city's Milk River district portion, by contrast, has separated storm sewers that discharge directly to the Milk RiverMacomb County Public Works, 2023 · SEMSD facilitiesJuly 2026
If a community is not listed here, that does not mean it is separated. It means we have not yet read a primary document that settles it, and we only publish what a source actually says. Communities we specifically could not classify either way as of July 2026 include Center Line, Ecorse, Melvindale, and Allen Park. Grosse Pointe Shores is a near miss: the city holds a municipal separate storm sewer (MS4) permit, MI0060181, which points toward separation, but we have not found a city or state document that states the system's history outright, so we leave it unclassified rather than guess. Livonia is a special case: an EPA permit is titled "Wayne County/Redford/Livonia CSO," but the county's own notification plan describes that facility's service area as 521 acres within Redford Township only, and Livonia's sanitary service comes through the separated Rouge Valley system, so we do not classify Livonia as combined without reading the permit itself. One suburb we can confirm separated: Harper Woods, whose "separated storm water sewer... ultimately discharges into the Milk River Treatment System" per the Milk River drain notification plan. Separated does not mean safe. A separated sanitary line can still surcharge in a heavy storm, and older footing drains or downspouts tied into it can back up into a basement even where stormwater and sewage run in different pipes. The regional operator's own summary supports caution in both directions: "a large majority of the suburban communities are served by separated storm/sewer systems" (GLWA 2022–2026 Capital Improvement Plan, Appendix D, December 2020). Sewer systems also change: Dearborn finished large-scale separation in 2021, and Grosse Pointe Farms separated its lakeside district around 2000, with inland separation phases starting in 2026. If you have a primary source that corrects or completes this table, we want it: [email protected].

The records we are still chasing

This table grows by document, not by guess, and a few gaps are still open. Each has a specific record that would close it. Center Line, Ecorse, Melvindale, and Allen Park need a combined-or-separated statement from a city engineering plan, an NPDES permit, or the regional wastewater master plan's service-area map. Grosse Pointe Shores needs a document stating its sewer history, not just its current separate-storm-sewer permit. And for a community already on the list, the discharge record itself, how often a district's basins have actually overflowed and how each of those events was logged over the years, would turn a static classification into a history. If you have as-built drawings, saved overflow records, a public works notice, or a basement that floods on a street this table reads as clean, that is exactly what sharpens the map: [email protected].

Why the Grosse Pointes score so high

Readers of our 2026 findings regularly ask why the Grosse Pointes, some of the metro's most valuable housing, sit near the top of the Basement Risk Index. The score itself is driven by housing age: the Pointes are overwhelmingly pre-1960 housing, built before sump pumps, backwater valves, and modern drainage were standard. The sewer record is consistent with that picture rather than contradicting it. Grosse Pointe Woods is the strongest case, its own 2023 plan states the city "owns and operates a combined sewer system that serves the entire city." Grosse Pointe Farms was built combined. Its lakeside district was separated around 2000, and the inland district remains combined, with separation phased 2026 to 2028. Grosse Pointe Park is combined in part, with separation work ongoing. The City of Grosse Pointe is combined in part, with a FEMA-funded separation program in early design. Grosse Pointe Shores holds a separate-storm-sewer (MS4) permit, but we could not find a primary source documenting its local sewer history or separation timeline, so we leave it unclassified rather than guess. Old housing and shared pipes arrived together, and across the Pointes the separation work is happening now, decades after the housing was built.

Close-up map of the five Grosse Pointes and Harper Woods: Grosse Pointe Woods red for citywide combined, Grosse Pointe Farms, the City of Grosse Pointe, and Grosse Pointe Park amber for combined in part, Grosse Pointe Shores gray for not yet classified, Harper Woods green for separation documented
The Pointes, up close. Sewer status varies by city and district: Grosse Pointe Woods is verified citywide combined. Grosse Pointe Farms, Grosse Pointe Park, and the City of Grosse Pointe are combined in part. Grosse Pointe Shores remains unclassified pending a primary source. Harper Woods has documented separation.

What this means for the Basement Risk Index

To be plain about our own methodology: sewer status is explanatory context on this page, not a scored input to the BRI. The index is built from U.S. Census housing-vintage measures, with the City of Detroit's score also incorporating its documented 311 water-in-basement record. Suburban scores are modeled from housing data and labeled as modeled, as our methodology spells out. Combined sewers are part of the reason housing age predicts basement trouble so well here, which is also visible in our analysis of who bears Detroit's basement-flood burden, where the hardest-hit neighborhoods sit on the city's oldest housing and combined pipes. This table is the receipts for that context, community by community.

During storm season, the live Basement Backup Watch pairs this context with active flood alerts, the 48-hour rain outlook, and river levels for all three counties.

See how your community scores

Look up any of the 116 metro Detroit communities on the interactive Basement Risk Index map.

Open the map →

Sources

Every classification above traces to a named government or system-operator document, checked July 2026. The live discharge record for any Michigan CSO event is EGLE's public overflow list, linked below. The map images on this page are free to share or republish with attribution to Basement Risk Check and a link to this page.

If you're fixing this

We keep public-record profiles of metro Detroit basement waterproofing contractors, plus city hubs for the highest-risk communities with verified coverage, including the Grosse Pointes discussed above.

No contractor pays for placement or ranking here. How we verify.

Cite as: Basement Risk Check, “Combined Sewers and Basement Flooding in Metro Detroit,” 2026. basementriskcheck.com/combined-sewers